4.5 Article

Direct Visualization of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase and Its Effects on Silicon Electrochemical Performance

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
Volume 3, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600438

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. NSF [DMR-1126468]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1126468] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) as an electrolyte additive can considerably improve the cycling performance of silicon (Si) electrodes in Li-ion batteries. However, the fundamental mechanism for how FEC contributes to solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) morphological changes and chemical composition is not well understood. Here, scanning transmission electron microscopy coupled with electron energy loss spectroscopy gives a comprehensive insight as to how FEC affects the SEI evolution in terms of composition and morphology throughout electrochemical cycling. In the fi rst lithiation cycle, the electrode cycled in ethylene carbonate (EC): diethylene carbonate (DEC) forms a porous uneven SEI composed of mostly Li2CO3. However, the electrode cycled in EC/DEC/FEC is covered in a dense and uniform SEI containing mostly LiF. Interestingly, the intrinsic oxide layer (LixSiO gamma) is not observed at the interface of electrode cycled in EC/DEC/FEC after 1 cycle. This is consistent with fl uoride anion formation from the reduction of FEC, which leads to the chemical attack of any silicon-oxide surface passivation layer. Furthermore, surface sensitive helium ion microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques give further insights to the SEI composition and morphology in both electrodes cycled with different electrolytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available