4.6 Article

Fermi arcs from dynamical variational Monte Carlo

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 106, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.245132

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an extension of the variational Monte Carlo method to investigate the behavior of Fermi arcs in systems with open boundary conditions. It is important for addressing the long-standing issue of pseudogaps in high-temperature superconductors.
Variational Monte Carlo is a many-body numerical method that scales well with system size. It has been extended to study the Green function only recently by Charlebois and Imada [Phys. Rev. X 10, 041023 (2020)]. Here we generalize the approach to systems with open boundary conditions in the absence of translational invariance. Removing these constraints permits the application of embedding techniques like cluster pertur-bation theory (CPT). Using this approach we provide robust evidence of the existence of Fermi arcs in the one-band Hubbard model, an enduring problem in the physics of the pseudogap in cuprate high-temperature superconductors. We study the behavior of the Fermi surface and of the density of states as a function of hole doping for clusters of up to 64 sites, well beyond the reach of modern exact diagonalization solvers. We observe that the technique reliably captures the transition from a Mott insulator at half filling to a pseudogap, evidenced by the formation of Fermi arcs, and finally to a metallic state at large doping. The ability to treat large clusters with quantum cluster methods helps to minimize potential finite-size effects and enables the study of systems with long-range orders, which will help extend the reach of these already powerful methods and provide important insights on the nature of various strongly correlated many-electron systems, including the high-Tc cuprate superconductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available