4.2 Article

An efficient immunoassay for the B cell help function of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory CD4+ T cells

Journal

CELL REPORTS METHODS
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100224

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SERB, DST [IPA/2020/000077]
  2. DBT [BT/PR30223/MED/2018]
  3. NII core grant
  4. NIH [75N9301900065, U01AI141995-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The B cell help function of CD4(+) T cells is crucial in adaptive immunity. This study presents an improved method for quantitative measurement of T cell-dependent B cell responses using antigen-specific T-B cocultures, requiring as few as 90 T cells. The inclusion of monocytes in the cocultures enhances the interaction between T and B cells, leading to improved activation and immunological output.
The B cell help'' function of CD4(+) T cells is an important mechanism of adaptive immunity. Here, we describe improved antigen-specific T-B cocultures for quantitative measurement of T cell-dependent B cell responses, with as few as similar to 90 T cells. Utilizing M. tuberculosis (Mtb), we show that early priming and activation of CD4(+) T cells is important for productive interaction between T and B cells and that similar effects are achieved by supplementing cocultures with monocytes. We find that monocytes promote survivability of B cells via BAFF and stem cell growth factor (SCGF)/C-type lectin domain family 11 member A (CLEC11A), but this alone does not fully recapitulate the effects of monocyte supplementation. Importantly, we demonstrate improved activation and immunological output of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific memory CD4(+) T-B cell cocultures with the inclusion of monocytes. This method may therefore provide a more sensitive assay to evaluate the B cell help quality of memory CD4(+) T cells, for example, after vaccination or natural infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available