3.8 Proceedings Paper

Classification of Cortical Bone Thicknesses Based on RF Signal Spectral Analysis

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/IUS54386.2022.9958573

Keywords

Bone characterization; Continuous wavelet transformation; Deep learning; Chirp signal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cortical bone thickness is a crucial biomarker for assessing bone fragility and fracture risk. However, ultrasound assessment of bone is challenging due to the complex nature of bone and the difference in acoustic impedances between bone and soft tissue. This study aims to estimate cortical bone thickness using spectral analysis, circumventing the limitations of traditional speed of sound measurements. Multi-frequency ultrasound acquisitions and continuous wavelet transformation are utilized to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology on simulated and ex vivo bone tissue datasets.
Cortical bone thickness is an important biomarker of bone fragility that reveals the risk of fractures. However, ultrasound bone assessment is challenging due to the complex nature of bone, such as varying porosity and microarchitecture, and the large difference between bone and soft tissue acoustic impedances. The research objective of this study is to develop a method to estimate cortical bone thickness by using spectral analysis, while avoiding traditional speed of sound measurements' figures due to the porous structure of bone tissue. In this study, multi-frequency ultrasound acquisitions have been used to cover a wide range of bone thickness and porosity values. Frequency modulated chirp waveforms are used as a transmit signal to increase the measurement SNR and the continuous wavelet transformation (CWT) is employed for the spectral analysis. The feasibility of the proposed methodology is demonstrated on simulated datasets and via experiments using ex vivo bone tissue. The preliminary experimental results showed a potential for cortical thickness classification using the received RF data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available