4.8 Article

Model Compounds for Intermediates and Transition States in Sonogashira and Negishi Coupling: d8-d10 Bonds in Large Heterobimetallic Complexes Are Weaker than Computational Chemistry Predicts

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 144, Issue 23, Pages 10330-10343

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c0164110330

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ETH Zurich
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an experimental investigation, accompanied by DFT calculations, on heterobimetallic complexes with Pd(II) and Cu(I), Ag(I), or Au(I). The findings suggest that only the transition state has the two metal centers within bonding distance. Additionally, it is found that the dispersion-corrected DFT method used in the study tends to overestimate the strength of the metal-metal interaction, leading to systematic distortion in the computed potential energy surface for transmetalation.
We report an experimental study, with accompanying DFT calculations, on a series of heterobimetallic complexes with Pd(II) and Cu(I), Ag(I), or Au(I). The isolable pincer complexes are models for the intermediates and transition state for the transmetalation step in Sonogashira and Negishi coupling reactions, among which, according to the DFT calculations, only the transition state has the two metal centers within bonding distance. Furthermore, we report a substituted version of an analogous heterobimetallic complex in which a competing dissociation sets an upper-bound on the strength of the d8-d10 metal-metal bond. Analysis of the structures in the solid state and in solution, and the competitive dissociation experiment in the gas phase, indicate that the dispersion-corrected DFT method used in the study appears to overestimate the strength of the metal-metal interaction, thus distorting the shape of the computed potential energy surface systematically for transmetalation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available