4.6 Review

Lymph Node Mapping for Tumor Micrometastasis

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 2307-2320

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c001112307

Keywords

lymph node mapping; micrometastasis; fluorescent probes; fluorescent nanoparticles; self-illuminating nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Key Research and Develop- ment Project from Science and Technology Department of Jiangxi Province [20202BBGL73032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lymph node mapping is crucial for the prevention, prognosis, and treatment of cancer. Traditional clinical detection methods have limitations, leading to the development of new fluorescent probes and nanoparticles with improved properties for lymph node mapping.
Lymph node mapping for tumor micrometastasis is of great significance for the prevention, prognosis, and treatment of cancer. Currently, the traditional clinical detection methods (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography/computed tomography) in clinical lymph node mapping still have some inherent disadvantages, which have prompted the development of various fluorescent probes for lymph node mapping. However, the conventional fluorescent probes such as indocyanine green or methylene blue in lymph node mapping are still accompanied by several problems such as impaired surgical field vision due to dye staining or less accumulation and shorter retention time in the lymph node. In a recent achievement, newly designed nanoparticles are prepared with novel properties that could be attractive for lymph node mapping. In this review, we will provide details on the progress of various nanoparticles for lymph node mapping and emphasize other multivariant properties in different nanoparticles, including strong tumor-targeting affinity and specificity, self-luminescence, and even with the function to kill metastatic cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available