3.8 Article

AMBER PRODUCTS IN THE NEOLITHIC - ENEOLITHIC OF THE FOREST ZONE OF EASTERN EUROPE

Journal

ROSSIISKAYA ARKHEOLOGIYA
Volume -, Issue 4, Pages 7-20

Publisher

IZDATELSTVO NAUKA
DOI: 10.31857/S0869606322040134

Keywords

amber products; the Neolithic-Eneolithic; the Baltics; the north of Eastern Europe

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reason for the widespread popularity of amber jewelry in the forest zone of Eastern Europe during the Neolithic - Eneolithic period remains unknown. It is speculated that there was an active exchange of amber products for furs or stones in ancient times. The distribution of amber products in burial grounds differed from other prestigious items, possibly indicating social stratification and the presence of respected hunters.
The reason for the wide spreading of amber jewellery in the forest zone of Eastern Europe during the Neolithic - Eneolithic remains an open question. Normally, there is no amber raw material at the sites; traces of refinement or repair of objects are recorded occasionally. Perhaps an active exchange of amber products for furs or some types of stone took place as early as in ancient times. Indirect evidence of this may be a sharp increase in hunting for marten at hunter-gatherer sites at the end of the Mesolithic and, especially, in the Neolithic, which can be observed in the range of faunal remains at the sites of the Upper Volga region and the North. On the burial grounds of that period in the forest zone of Eastern Europe, there is a noticeable difference in the distribution of amber products and other prestigious items. Moreover, especially rich burials emerged, which can be explained by the social stratification of communities and the separation of rich or especially respected hunters. The emergence of amber products did not change the traditions of local ethnic and cultural formations (cultures) anywhere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available