4.5 Review

Antibody-Drug Conjugates Targeting Tumor-Specific Mucin Glycoepitopes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2711301

Keywords

glycoepitope; mucin; antibody-drug conjugate; cancer treatment

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [PJT-166180]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Challenge Grant [707343]
  3. Research Trainee Award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Finding the ideal epitope for ADC development is crucial. Mucins are ideal carriers of altered glycoepitopes and three types of glycoepitopes are described. Clinical and pre-clinical results of ADCs targeting MUC1 or podocalyxin glycoepitopes are reviewed, and methods to improve glycoepitope-targeting ADCs are discussed.
Finding the ideal epitope to target is a key element for the development of an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). To maximize drug delivery to tumor cells and reduce side effects, this epitope should be specific to cancer cells and spare all normal tissue. During cancer progression, glycosylation pathways are frequently altered leading to the generation of new glycosylation patterns selective to cancer cells. Mucins are highly glycosylated proteins frequently expressed on tumors and, thus, ideal presenters of altered glycoepitopes. In this review, we describe three different types of glycoepitopes that are recognized by monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and, therefore, serve as ideal scaffolds for ADC; glycan-only, glycopeptide and shielded-peptide glycoepitopes. We review pre-clinical and clinical results obtained with ADCs targeting glycoepitopes expressed on MUC1 or podocalyxin (Podxl) and two mAbs targeting glycoepitopes expressed on MUC16 or MUC5AC as potential candidates for ADC development. Finally, we discuss current limits in using glycoepitope-targeting ADCs to treat cancer and propose methods to improve their efficacy and specificity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available