3.8 Article

TRANSLATIONAL STUDY OF GUNSHOT INJURY TO THE COLON BY MODERN TYPES OF BULLETS

Journal

WORLD OF MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages 192-196

Publisher

SCIENTIFIC SOC ANATOMISTS HISTOLOGISTS & EMBRYOLOGISTS UKRAINE
DOI: 10.26724/2079-8334-2022-4-82-192-196

Keywords

gunshot wound; colon injuries; combat injury; hollow -point bullet; ballistic gel

Funding

  1. research project Development of the medical care system based on the experience of implementing measures to ensure national security and defence, repel and deter armed aggression of the Russian Federation [0120U101456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gunshot injuries to the colon are common and severe in combat casualties. This study investigated colon wounds in 374 servicemen injured in East Ukraine and confirmed the impact of different types of wounding projectiles on colon injuries through experimental analysis. The severity of colon injuries varied depending on the type of projectile.
Gunshot injuries to the colon are frequent in combat casualties, including the current invasion of Russia into Ukraine. Colon wounds are associated with high mortality and severe purulent-septic complications. In this translational study, we investigated gunshot wounds to the colon in 374 servicemen who were injured in East Ukraine. In the experimental part, a special certified ballistic gel 10 % FBI Ballistic Block was used for ballistic analyses of various bullets to confirm clinical data. Data analyses showed that the severity of colon injuries depended on the type of wounding projectile, which was confirmed in gel experiments. The action of the wounding projectile bullet V-Max 5.45x39 mm (with expansive properties) showed significant differences in relation to the colon injury as compared to the usual all-shell claw PS (p<0.05). Hollow-point bullet wounds require different surgical tactics as opposed to full-shell bullet wounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available