3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Methodological Proposal for the Comparison of 3D Photogrammetric Models

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_94

Keywords

Hausdorff distance; Mesh; Accuracy assessment; Cultural Heritage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of simplification of geometric surfaces lacks a universally recognized definition of the error, but this study proposes a method for quantification.
The field of simplification of geometric surfaces still lacks a formal and universally recognized definition of the error, which should involve both the approximation of the shape and the conservation of the other attributes of the mesh (starting from the colour). In order to solve this problem, we propose a hypothesis of methodological comparison that allow the evaluation of differences between two homologous surfaces, quantified employing the Hausdorff distance. Themain advantage of this method is the independence from sampling techniques used to produce the mesh, without losing its characteristics of objectivity and generality. The Hausdorff distance geometrically represents the distance between two sets A and B in a suitable metric space, and it is defined as the maximum between the excess of A over B and the excess of B over A. This value is then compared with the average length of the diagonals of the bounding boxes of the homologous models, i.e. the parallelepipeds corresponding to the minimum volume that completely envelops each set; this results in an effective representation of error in relative terms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available