3.8 Proceedings Paper

Study of the photoresponse of ITO/SiO2/Si/SiO2/Al MIS capacitor structures

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/LAEDC54796.2022.9908220

Keywords

SiO2/Si/SiO2 ML; MIS-like devices; Si-ncs; thermal annealing; photocurrent

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) of Mexico [001639]
  2. CONACYT [A1-S-8205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the photoresponse properties of metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) devices using SiO2/Si/SiO2 multilayers as active I-layer on p-type and n-type Si substrates were investigated. The devices with thermally annealed multilayers showed no photoresponse, while those with as-deposited multilayers exhibited strong photoresponse. The current vs voltage curves were tested under various LED illuminations, with a light/dark current ratio of about 8.54E3 for n-type substrates and 7.95E3 for p-type substrates at 0V. The devices on n-type Si substrate without thermal annealing showed the best performance, with a spectral response of 58.28 mA/W and an external quantum efficiency of 13.58% at 532 nm.
In this work, we report on the photoresponse properties of metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) devices using a SiO2/Si/SiO2 multilayer (ML) as active I-layer and deposited on p-type and n-type Si substrates. The effect of a post-thermal annealing of the SiO2/Si/SiO2 ML was analyzed. Thermally annealed (TA)-MLs did not show any photoresponse, while devices with as-deposited (AD)-SiO2/Si/SiO2 ML (without TA) exhibit a strong photoresponse. Current vs voltage curves were performed in dark and under illumination using white, blue, green, yellow, and red LEDs; the (white) light/dark current ratio obtained at 0V is about 8.54E3 and 7.95E3 for n-type and p-type substrates, respectively. Moreover, AD-ML devices on n-type Si substrate exhibit the best results with a spectral response and external quantum efficiency values (at 0V) of 58.28 mA/W and 13.58% at 532 nm, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available