3.8 Article

Embryo/Fetus Doses from 18F-Fludeoxyglucose Radiopharmaceutical in Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 109-113

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_115_21

Keywords

Embryo/fetus dose; F-18 fludeoxyglucose; positron emission tomography/computed tomography; radiation doses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to calculate the embryo/fetus doses in pregnant women who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT scan. The results showed that the embryo/fetus dose from F-18 FDG PET/CT was <15 mGy. It is recommended to consider childbearing prior to undergoing scintigraphy to avoid accidental radiation exposure and stochastic risks.
Aim: The embryo/fetus may be accidentally exposed to ionizing radiation. The aim of this study is to calculate embryo/fetus doses in pregnant women who underwent F-18 fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. Materials and Methods: Between June 2015 and June 2021, 15 pregnant women underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT applied to the Genetic Research Center (GETAM). The OLINDA/EXM package program was used for internal radiation dosimetry according to the Medical Internal Radiation Dose scheme. FetDose V4 computer software was used to compute the embryo/fetus absorbed dose from CT scan. Results: The amount of the injected F-18 FDG activity to patients varied between 333 and 555 MBq. The mean embryo/fetal dose from F-18 FDG was 7.2 +/- 2.8 mGy. In addition, the CT component dose to the embryo/fetus dose ranged from 8.5 to 16 mGy with a mean of 12.14 +/- 2.05. Conclusions: The embryo/fetus dose from F-18 FDG PET/CT was <15 mGy, however, questioning the women's childbearing prior to scintigraphy is the first-line strategy to avoid accidental radiation exposure and stochastic risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available