4.1 Article

Fimbriae have distinguishable roles in Proteus mirabilis biofilm formation

Journal

PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftw033

Keywords

urinary tract infection; Proteus mirabilis; fimbriae; biofilm

Funding

  1. ANII-Uruguay [FCE 104760]
  2. PEDECIBA-Uruguay
  3. FONDECYT [1151029]
  4. FONDEF [D11I1096 ANILLO ACT 10712]
  5. ICM [P09-015-F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteus mirabilis is one of the most common etiological agents of complicated urinary tract infections, especially those associated with catheterization. This is related to the ability of P. mirabilis to form biofilms on different surfaces. This pathogen encodes 17 putative fimbrial operons, the highest number found in any sequenced bacterial species so far. The present study analyzed the role of four P. mirabilis fimbriae (MR/P, UCA, ATF and PMF) in biofilm formation using isogenic mutants. Experimental approaches included migration over catheter, swimming and swarming motility, the semiquantitative assay based on adhesion and crystal violet staining, and biofilm development by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Different assays were performed using LB or artificial urine. Results indicated that the different fimbriae contribute to the formation of a stable and functional biofilm. Fimbriae revealed particular associated roles. First, all the mutants showed a significantly reduced ability to migrate across urinary catheter sections but neither swimming nor swarming motility were affected. However, some mutants formed smaller biofilms compared with the wild type (MRP and ATF) while others formed significantly larger biofilms (UCA and PMF) showing different bioarchitecture features. It can be concluded that P. mirabilis fimbriae have distinguishable roles in the generation of biofilms, particularly in association with catheters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available