4.8 Article

Structural integrity-Searching the key factor to suppress the voltage fade of Li-rich layered cathode materials through 3D X-ray imaging and spectroscopy techniques

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 164-171

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.039

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries; Cathode; Lithium rich layered oxides; Voltage fade; Transmission X-ray microscopy

Funding

  1. National Scientific Foundation of China [51325206]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies [DE-5C0012704]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-765F00515]
  4. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-rich layered materials are important cathode compounds used in commercial lithium ion batteries, which, however, suffers from some drawbacks including the so-called voltage fade upon electrochemical cycling. This study employs novel transmission X-ray microscopy to investigate the electrochemical reaction induced morphological and chemical changes in the Li-rich Li2Ru0.5Mn0.5O3 cathode particles at the meso to nano scale. Combined X-ray spectroscopy, diffraction and microscopy experiments are performed to systematically study this cathode material's evolution upon cycling as well as to establish a comprehensive understanding of the structural origin of capacity fade through 2D and 3D fine length scale morphology and heterogeneity change of this material. This work suggests that atomic manipulation (e.g. doping, substitution etc.) or nano engineering (e.g. nano-sizing, heterogeneous structure) are important strategies to mitigate the internal strain and defects induced by extensive lithium insertion/extraction. It also shows that maintaining the structural integrity is the key in designing and synthesizing lithium-rich layered materials with better cycle stability. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available