4.7 Article

SPRSound: Open-Source SJTU Paediatric Respiratory Sound Database

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2022.3204910

Keywords

Databases; Pediatrics; Hospitals; Annotations; Lung; Quality assurance; Task analysis; Paediatric respiratory sound database; respiratory sound classification; quality assurance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By developing the first open-access paediatric respiratory sound database, SPRSound, and using a custom-made sound label annotation software, SoundAnn, we established a team of 11 experienced paediatric physicians to provide accurate labels for the dataset. Through investigating different feature extraction methods and machine learning classifiers, we achieved good classification performance at the event level and record level.
It has proved that the auscultation of respiratory sound has advantage in early respiratory diagnosis. Various methods have been raised to perform automatic respiratory sound analysis to reduce subjective diagnosis and physicians' workload. However, these methods highly rely on the quality of respiratory sound database. In this work, we have developed the first open-access paediatric respiratory sound database, SPRSound. The database consists of 2,683 records and 9,089 respiratory sound events from 292 participants. Accurate label is important to achieve a good prediction for adventitious respiratory sound classification problem. A custom-made sound label annotation software (SoundAnn) has been developed to perform sound editing, sound annotation, and quality assurance evaluation. A team of 11 experienced paediatric physicians is involved in the entire process to establish golden standard reference for the dataset. To verify the robustness and accuracy of the classification model, we have investigated the effects of different feature extraction methods and machine learning classifiers on the classification performance of our dataset. As such, we have achieved a score of 75.22%, 61.57%, 56.71%, and 37.84% for the four different classification challenges at the event level and record level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available