4.8 Article

Hard carbon nanoparticles as high-capacity, high-stability anodic materials for Na-ion batteries

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 279-288

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.034

Keywords

Hard carbon; Ionic diffusion coefficient; Electrochemical impedance; Anode; Na-ion battery

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [KC020105-FWP12152]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21273090, 21373155]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0419]
  4. Hubei National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [2014CFA038]
  5. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hard carbon nanoparticles (HCNP) were synthesized by the pyrolysis of a polyaniline precursor. The measured Na+ cation diffusion coefficient (10(-13)-10(-15) cm(2) s(-1)) in the HCNP obtained at 1150 degrees C is two orders of magnitude lower than that of Li+ in graphite (10(-10)-10(-13) cm(2) s(-1)), indicating that reducing the carbon particle size is very important for improving electrochemical performance. These measurements also enable a clear visualization of the stepwise reaction phases and rate changes which occur throughout the insertion/extraction processes in HCNP, The electrochemical measurements also show that the nano -sized HCNP obtained at 1150 degrees C exhibited higher practical capacity at voltages lower than 1.2 V (vs. Na/Na+), as well as a prolonged cycling stability, which is attributed to an optimum spacing of 0.366 nm between the graphitic layers and the nano particular size resulting in a low -barrier Na+ cation insertion. These results suggest that HCNP is a very promising high-capacity/stability anode for low cost sodium-ion batteries (SIBS). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available