4.1 Review

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Burn Healing Outcomes Between Silver Sulfadiazine and Aloe vera

Journal

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

CUREUS INC
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30815

Keywords

dermatology; plastic surgery; silver sulfadiazine; aloe vera; wound healing; burns

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the healing time of second-and third-degree burn wounds between silver sulfadiazine (SSD) and Aloe vera (AV). The meta-analysis demonstrated that the mean time to wound healing favored AV, indicating that the use of AV may accelerate the healing process for burn wounds. Therefore, greater attention should be given to the use of AV as an adjunct for burn wound healing.
Burn wounds remain a prevalent problem in the developed and developing world. A multitude of remedies has been tested. This study evaluated the healing time of second-and third-degree burn wounds between silver sulfadiazine (SSD) and Aloe vera (AV). In July 2020, a systematic review of MEDLINE (Ovid) and PubMed (National Library of Medicine) was performed to identify studies that reported healing of second -and third-degree burns using either SSD or AV. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and carefully analyzed. Our goal was to report the healing time for these burns using SSD and AV. A total of eight studies published between 1988 and 2018 reporting healing of second-and third-degree burns using SSD and AV were included in this review. Six were cohort studies and two were randomized controlled trials. The studies included both animal and human subjects. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the mean time to wound healing favored AV (RR:-1.34, 95% CI:-1.8 to 0.9, p < 0.001). It would seem that time to healing benefitted those burns in which AV was utilized. In conclusion, increased consideration and emphasis should be placed on using AV to aid the healing of second-and third-degree burns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available