3.8 Proceedings Paper

Investigating the training of convolutional neural networks with limited sidescan sonar image datasets

Journal

2022 OCEANS HAMPTON ROADS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/OCEANS47191.2022.9977255

Keywords

Deep Learning; Sidescan Sonar; Computer Vision; Sonar Imagery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the analysis of sonar images using deep learning methods and investigates the impact of data augmentation and image complexity reduction on model performance.
For the automatic analysis of sonar images, deep learning methods, like convolutional neural networks (CNN), outperform traditional approaches. However, the training of a CNN requires a sufficient dataset, which is difficult to obtain. Thus, ways to improve the training of CNNs with limited data are necessary to reach a reasonable performance of the networks under such circumstances. In our work we consider an extreme case of having less than 20 samples per class to train a CNN for classification. We train two custom CNNs with various depths from scratch, as well as the even deeper VGG-16 network, which is a commonly used architecture for sonar imagery. Furthermore, the benefits of several augmentation methods in the sonar imagery context are investigated. In addition, we study how the image complexity can be reduced so that a CNN can learn more efficiently with the limited training data. Besides, we evaluate if we can feed additional features to the CNN for a further improvement. Our best model is a VGG-16 which is trained using flipping, cropping and addition of Gaussian noise for data augmentation. The complexity of the input images is reduced using tight bounding boxes for snippet extraction, which remove the object size information. Adding this size information as an explicit feature to the CNN increases the performance and results in a balanced accuracy of 77.2%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available