4.6 Article

Immunogenic dynamics and SARS-CoV-2 variant neutralisation of the heterologous ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccination: Secondary analysis of the randomised CombiVacS study

Journal

ECLINICALMEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101529

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Heterologous vaccination; Neutralisation; Variants; Antibodies

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PTC20/00018, PT17/0017]
  3. State Plan for Research, Development, and Innovation
  4. State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation [2017-20]
  5. Subdirec-torate General for Evaluation and Promotion of Research, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  6. FEDER funds
  7. VACCELER-ATE
  8. EU's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [101037867, 860003]
  9. Institute of Health Carlos III (Instituto de Salud Carlos III - ISCIII -) [PI19CIII/00004, PI21CIII/00025]
  10. COVID-19 FUND [COV20/00679, COV20/00072]
  11. Maria Castillo-de la Osa
  12. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) A way to make Europe
  13. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PEJ2018-004557-A]
  14. [PCT20/00018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the evolution of humoral and cellular immune response to the ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 heterologous vaccination up to day 180. The results showed a decrease in antibody titers and neutralizing response against Omicron and Beta variants at day 180.
Background The CombiVacS study was designed to assess immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the heterologous ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 combination, and 14-day results showed a strong immune response. The present secondary analysis addresses the evolution of humoral and cellular response up to day 180. Methods Between April 24 and 30, 2021, 676 adults primed with ChAdOx1-S were enrolled in five hospitals in Spain, and randomised to receive BNT162b2 as second dose (interventional group [IG]) or no vaccine (control group [CG]). Individuals from CG received BNT162b2 as second dose and also on day 28, as planned based on favourable results on day 14. Humoral immunogenicity, measured by immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD), antibody functionality using pseudovirus neutralisation assays for the reference (G614), Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, as well as cellular immune response using interferon-g and IL-2 immunoassays were assessed at day 28 after BNT162b2 in both groups, at day 90 (planned only in the interventional group) and at day 180 (laboratory data cut-off on Nov 19, 2021). This study was registered with EudraCT (2021-001978-37) and Clini-calTrials.gov (NCT04860739). Findings In this secondary analysis, 664 individuals (441 from IG and 223 from CG) were included. At day 28 post vaccine, geometric mean titres (GMT) of RBD antibodies were 5616.91 BAU/mL (95% CI 5296.49-5956.71) in the IG and 7298.22 BAU/mL (6739.41-7903.37) in the CG (p < 0.0001). RBD antibodies titres decreased at day 180 (1142.0 BAU/mL [1048.69-1243.62] and 1836.4 BAU/mL [1621.62-2079.62] in the IG and CG, respectively; p < 0.0001). Neutralising antibodies also waned from day 28 to day 180 in both the IG (1429.01 [1220.37-1673.33] and 198.72 [161.54-244.47], respectively) and the CG (1503.28 [1210.71-1866.54] and 295.57 [209.84-416.33], respectively). The lowest variant-specific response was observed against Omicron-and Beta variants, with low propor-tion of individuals exhibiting specific neutralising antibody titres (NT50) >1:100 at day 180 (19% and 22%, respectively). Interpretation Titres of RBD antibodies decay over time, similar to homologous regimes. Our findings suggested that delaying administration of the second dose did not have a detrimental effect after vaccination and may have improved the response obtained. Lower neutralisation was observed against Omicron and Beta variants at day 180. Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available