4.7 Article

Calibrating the scintillation and ionization responses of xenon recoils for high-energy dark matter searches

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.052013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [SCW1676, SCW1508]
  2. DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  3. DOE/NNSA [DE-NA0000979]
  4. DOE Office of nuclear physics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the scintillation and ionization yields of xenon recoils were measured up to 426 keV. The results show that xenon-based dark matter experiments can significantly increase their sensitivity to high-energy dark matter by including energy regions that were previously inaccessible.
Liquid xenon-based direct detection dark matter experiments have recently expanded their searches to include high-energy nuclear recoil events as motivated by effective field theory dark matter and inelastic dark matter interaction models, but few xenon recoil calibrations above 100 keV are currently available. In this work, we measured the scintillation and ionization yields of xenon recoils up to 426 keV. The experiment uses 14.1 MeV neutrons to scatter off xenon in a compact liquid xenon time projection chamber and produce quasimonoenergetic xenon recoils between 39 and 426 keV. We report the xenon recoil responses and their electric field dependence for recoil energies up to 306 keV; due to the low event statistics and the relatively mild field dependence, the yield values at higher energies are reported as the average of xenon responses for electric fields between 0.2 and 2.0 kV/cm. This result will enable xenonbased dark matter experiments to significantly increase their high-energy dark matter sensitivities by including energy regions that were previously inaccessible due to lack of calibrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available