3.9 Article

Blood-brain barrier dysfunction and reduced cerebrospinal fluid levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein-β in patients with subcortical small-vessel disease

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12296

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid beta; blood-brain barrier; cerebrospinal fluid; subcortical small-vessel disease

Funding

  1. Swedish government [ALFGBG-724331, ALFGBG-722371, ALFGBG-720931, ALFGBG-715986, ALFGBG-720661]
  2. Swedish county councils, and the ALF agreement [ALFGBG-724331, ALFGBG-722371, ALFGBG-720931, ALFGBG-715986, ALFGBG-720661]
  3. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation
  4. Demensfonden, Sweden
  5. Gun amp
  6. Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse, Sweden
  7. Stiftelsen foer Gamla Tjaenarinnor, Sweden
  8. Gunvor och Josef Aners stiftelse, Sweden
  9. Formas, a Swedish government research council for sustainable development
  10. Hedlunds stiftelse, Sweden
  11. Stiftelsen Hjalmar Svenssons Forskningsfond, Sweden
  12. Stiftelsen Laengmanska kulturfonden, Sweden
  13. Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse, Sweden
  14. Stiftelsen Psykiatriska Forskningsfonden, Sweden
  15. Royal Society of Arts and Sciences in Gothenburg, Sweden
  16. Sweden's innovation agency Vinnova
  17. The Wenner-Gren Foundations, Sweden
  18. Wilhelm amp
  19. Martina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond, Sweden
  20. ahlenstiftelsen, Sweden
  21. Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse, Sweden
  22. Swedish Research Council [2018-02532]
  23. European Research Council [681712]
  24. Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA [201809-2016862]
  25. AD Strategic Fund
  26. Alzheimer's Association [ADSF-21-831376-C, ADSF-21-831381-C, ADSF-21-831377-C]
  27. Olav Thon Foundation
  28. Erling-Persson Family Foundation
  29. Stiftelsen foer Gamla Tjaenarinnor
  30. Hjaernfonden, Sweden [FO2019-0228]
  31. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [860197]
  32. UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL
  33. National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA [1R01AG068398-01]
  34. Alzheimer's Association 2021 Zenith Award [ZEN-21-848495]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We found that SSVD patients have a different biomarker profile, with lower levels of sAPP-β compared to AD patients and controls. We also observed signs of blood-brain barrier dysfunction in SSVD. These findings support the concept that SSVD is a distinct form of vascular cognitive disorder (VCD).
IntroductionSubcortical small-vessel disease (SSVD) is the most common vascular cognitive disorder. However, because no disease-specific cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are available for SSVD, our aim was to identify such markers. MethodsWe included 170 healthy controls and patients from the Gothenburg Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) study clinically diagnosed with SSVD dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), or mixed AD/SSVD. We quantified CSF levels of amyloid-beta (A beta)(x-38), A beta(x-40), A beta(x-42), as well as soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP)-alpha and sAPP-beta. ResultssAPP-beta was lower in SSVD patients than in AD patients and controls. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that sAPP-beta moderately separated SSVD from AD and controls. Moreover, the CSF/serum albumin ratio was elevated exclusively in SSVD and could moderately separate SSVD from the other groups in ROC analyses. DiscussionSSVD has a biomarker profile that differs from that of AD and controls, and to some extent also from mixed AD/SSVD, suggesting that signs of blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and sAPP-beta could be additional tools to diagnose SSVD. HighlightsPatients with subcortical small-vessel disease (SSVD) exhibited reduced levels of sAPP-beta and disturbances of the blood-brain barrier (BBB).This biochemical pattern is different from that of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to some degree from that of mixed AD/SSVD.Our findings are speaking in favor of the concept that SSVD is a distinct vascular cognitive disorder (VCD) form.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available