4.5 Review

Exploiting Mouse Models to Recapitulate Clinical Tumor Dormancy and Recurrence in Breast Cancer

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 163, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bgac055

Keywords

transgenic mouse model; breast cancer; tumor dormancy; recurrence

Funding

  1. CURE Foundation Fellowship in Breast Cancer Research
  2. Canderel Graduate Studentship Award
  3. Cedars Cancer Institute Fellowship
  4. McGill Integrated Cancer Research Training Programme award
  5. Canada Research Chair in Molecular Oncology
  6. CIHR Foundation
  7. CCSRI Innovation Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer recurrence and metastasis remain major challenges for disease treatment. Understanding the biology of dormant tumors and cancer cells is crucial for overcoming clinical obstacles. Mouse models, particularly immunocompetent transgenic models, offer versatility and potential for studying the mechanisms of dormancy and developing therapeutic strategies.
Breast cancer recurrence and metastasis from activated dormant tumors remain the leading causes in disease morbidity. Women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer that accounts for nearly 80% of all cases face a lifelong risk of relapse after initial treatment. The biology of dormant tumors and dormant cancer cells that give rise to recurrent disease and metastasis remain to be understood for us to overcome the clinical challenges that they bring. The selection and optimization of preclinical models to recapitulate dormancy and recurrence in patients is critical for studying the underlying cellular and environmental factors. Here, we provide a brief review of studies that utilize mouse models to dissect the mechanisms of dormancy and therapeutic strategies to avert recurrence. This review specifically accentuates the versatility and benefits of immunocompetent transgenic mouse models that can be manipulated to recapitulate primary dormancy, metastatic dormancy, and post-therapy dormancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available