4.0 Article

THE EFFECT OF BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL BLEPHAROSPASM

Journal

ACTA CLINICA CROATICA
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 379-385

Publisher

SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIV HOSPITAL
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.03.02

Keywords

notulinum toxin type A; essential blepharospasm; dystonia; Blepharospasm Disability Index; Jankovic Rating Scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effect of botulinum toxin type A on patients with essential blepharospasm and their satisfaction. The results showed that the use of botulinum toxin significantly improved the quality of life and reduced the severity and frequency of symptoms.
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of botulinum toxin type A and satisfaction in patients with essential blepharospasm. The study included 12 subjects suffering from essential blepharospasm who received therapy with botulinum toxin type A injections. Respondents were given a Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) survey before and three weeks after the procedure with questions related to quality of life. They were also given a Jankovic Rating Scale with questions related to the severity and frequency of symptoms. The overall level of difficulties was reduced, mean-ing the quality of life increased after the application of botulinum toxin, and the study found that the increase was statistically significant (p = 0.003). The severity of symptoms after the application of botulinum toxin was reduced, which meant that there was a decrease in the severity of the difficulties, and the study found a statistically significant difference (p=0.003). The frequency of symptoms was reduced after botulinum toxin administration, and the study revealed a statistically significant dif-ference (p = 0.012). From the results of this study, we can determine that the use of botulinum toxin type A increases the quality of life and that the severity and frequency of symptoms are statistically significantly reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available