4.0 Article

Effect of Interface Ni and Ti Films on Antifriction Properties of Nanolayer Thin-Film WS2/g-C Coatings

Journal

PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI
Volume 85, Issue 11, Pages 1816-1820

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1063778822090307

Keywords

thin films; coefficient of friction; wear; amorphous structure

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [22-29-00197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thin-film coatings with laminar WS2 films and nanometer-thick carbon films were created using reactive pulsed laser deposition. The growth of the graphite-like state was activated by depositing carbon films (g-C) on the surface of nickel or titanium films between WS2 and g-C layers. It was found that the WS2/Ni/g-C/WS2 coating exhibited a very low coefficient of friction (less than 0.013) in dry air without lubrication, while the coating with a titanium interface film did not possess such properties. The structural state of the coating before and after the tribotest was monitored using micro-Raman spectroscopy (MRS), and possible causes for the different behavior of the coatings with the chosen metal film catalysts were revealed.
Model thin-film coatings containing laminar WS2 films and nanometer-thick carbon films are created by the reactive pulsed laser deposition technique. To activate the growth of the graphite-like state, the carbon films (g-C) were deposited on the surface of nickel or titanium films formed between WS2 and g-C layers. It is found that the WS2/Ni/g-C/WS2 coating is apt to manifest a very low coefficient of friction (less than 0.013) in tests in dry air without lubrication. The coating with a titanium interface film does not possess such properties. The structural state of the coating before and after the tribotest was monitored by micro-Raman spectroscopy (MRS). Possible causes of the different behavior of coatings with the chosen metal film catalysts are revealed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available