4.4 Article

Pathways Linked to Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia on Diffusion-Tensor Imaging in a Case with Midbrain Infarction

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 2575-2579

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.040

Keywords

Stroke; internuclear ophthalmoplegia; medial longitudinal fasciculus; diffusion-tensor imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Midbrain infarction shows diverse patterns of ophthalmoplegia; however, the association of ophthalmoplegia with a precise microanatomy has not been fully studied. Here, we report a patient with characteristic ophthalmoplegia and explore the associated pathologic fiber tracts using diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI). Methods: A 21-year-old woman with an 11-year history of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) abruptly developed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) with upward gaze and convergence palsies. Plasma levels of U1-ribonucleoprotein, double-stranded-DNA antibodies, and cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 were all increased. Diffusion-weighted imaging showed an acute ischemic lesion in the periaqueductal gray matter. Results: DTI exhibited a reduction of fractional anisotropy and an increase of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the tract involving the left medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) in the midbrain to the posterior commissure (PC) when compared to the right-sided tract in the midbrain and to the bilateral MLF in the upper pontine levels. Antiplatelet and immunosuppressant therapies dramatically improved her symptoms. Conclusions: We believe this is the first case of a patient with juvenile MCTD presenting with bilateral INO with an upward gaze and convergence palsies caused by midbrain infarction associated with vasculitis. It is suggested that DTI might identify the pathologic fiber tract connecting the left MLF in the midbrain to the PC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available