4.3 Article

Experimental study on the gas phase permeability of methane hydrate-bearing clayey sediments

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 378-384

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.055

Keywords

Hydrate-bearing sediment; Gas phase permeability; Hydrate saturation; Effective axial stress

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51509032, 51276028, 51227005]
  2. Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51436003]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016T90222]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT16LAB06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The permeability of hydrate-bearing sediment is one of the important parameters that influences the gas production rate of the hydrate reservoirs. In this study, a series of experiments were performed to investigate the gas phase permeability of kaolin clay with different hydrate saturations (0%, 2.59%, 4.23%, 11.44%, 16.84%, 22.91%, 27.57%, 28.85%, 34.16%, and 40.46%) at effective axial stresses of 1 MPa, 3 MPa. The results indicated that the gas phase permeability of the kaolin clay firstly decreases and then increases with the increase of hydrate saturation, due to the effect of blockage of hydrate particles and the increase of pores in inter-aggregate zones during methane hydrate formation. And there is a critical hydrate saturation that the gas phase permeability of hydrate-bearing clayey specimen equals to that of pure clayey specimen. Furthermore, the gas phase permeability of hydrate-bearing clayey specimens under high effective axial stresses is less than that under low effective axial stresses, due to the compaction of pore spaces and pore throats. And the stress sensitive index clearly increases with the increase of hydrate saturation, and the increase tendency become gentle when the hydrate saturation higher than 30%. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available