4.3 Article

Syngas production from CO2 reforming of methane over neodymium sesquioxide supported cobalt catalyst

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 873-885

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.07.059

Keywords

Cobalt; Dry reforming; Methane; Neodymium oxide; Syngas

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation Malaysia (MOSTI) [RDU130501]
  2. Institute of Postgraduate Studies, UMP
  3. Universiti Malaysia Pahang

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports for the first time the catalytic dry (CO2) reforming of methane over 20 wt%Co/80 wt% Nd2O3 catalyst. The catalyst was synthesized by wet-impregnation procedure and its physicochemical properties were characterized by TGA, XRD, FESEM, EDX, FTIR, H-2-TPR and TPD followed by activity testing in a fixed-bed reactor. The effects of feed ratios (CH4: CO2) ranged 0.1-1.0, reactant (CH4 and CO2) partial pressure (0-50 kPa) and temperature ranged 923-1023 K on the activity of the catalyst were investigated. The conversion of both reactants increased with the feed ratio and reaction temperature reaching maximum values of 62.7% and 82% for CH4 and CO2, respectively. The CO2 reforming of methane resulted into the formation of syngas with maximum yields of 59.91% and 62.02% for H-2 and CO, respectively, leading to formation of syngas ratio of 0.97. The mechanistic proposition includes the CH4 and CO2 adsorption, activation of CH4 by methane cracking and gasification of carbon deposited on the catalyst surface. The experimental data were fitted by Langmuir Hinshelwood kinetic models. Activation energy values of 21.89 and 62.04 kJ mol(-1) were obtained for the consumption of CO2 and CH4 respectively from Langmuir-Hinshelwood models. The lower values of activation energy obtained for CO2 compared to that of CH4 shows that the rate of consumption of CO2 was faster than that of CH4 leading to higher conversion of CO2. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available