4.6 Article

Lead-free Bi5-xLaxTi3FeO15 (x=0, 1) nanofibers toward wool keratin-based biocompatible piezoelectric nanogenerators

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 4, Issue 30, Pages 7324-7331

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6tc01828a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51172187]
  2. 111 Program of MOE [B08040]
  3. Xi'an Science and Technology Foundation [CXY1510-2]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [3102014JGY01004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biocompatible nanogenerators (NGs) are of vital importance for in vivo applications. In this work, Bi5-xLaxTi3FeO15 (x = 0, 1) nanofibers (NFs) toward wool keratin-based biocompatible piezoelectric NGs are demonstrated. The refined structure of Bi4LaTi3FeO15 (BLTF) NFs by the Rietveld method was confirmed to be a four-layer Aurivillius oxide with an orthorhombic space group A21am. Wool keratin was extracted using the oxidizing and subsequent deoxidizing reaction process. BLTF NFs are biocompatible in a bio-environment shown here using mice pre-osteoblasts MC3T3-E1. The BLTF NF NG can generate an output voltage of 0.14 V and output current of 41 nA (with a current density of 20.5 nA cm(-2)), with quite reproducible power generation. The prominent power generation of the BLTF NF NG partly originated from the La3+ substitution for the A-site Bi3+, which decreases the number of oxygen vacancies in the perovskite layers. Furthermore, piezoelectric NFs as exceptional fillers coupled sufficient connectivity, a larger degree of crystallinity and Young's modulus of the system together in the keratin matrix also contributed to enhanced piezoelectric power generation. In addition, one mechanism responsible for the optimal BLTF NF NG was proposed. This study offers new insights into the design and application of promising lead-free biocompatible devices with better fillers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available