4.6 Article

Screening procedure for structurally and electronically matched contact layers for high-performance solar cells: hybrid perovskites

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1149-1158

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tc04091d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS [15H04125, 25106005]
  2. MEXT Elements Strategy Initiative
  3. JST
  4. Royal Society
  5. EPSRC [EP/M009580/1, EP/J017361/1]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J017361/1, EP/M009580/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid progress in performance of solar cells based on hybrid halide perovskites means that devices based on these materials have reached a stage where research interest can now focus on development of robust technology. One of the key questions relating to these (and indeed any) devices is their lifetime and stability which in turn is often influenced by the quality of interfaces and junctions within the device. In this study we present a methodology which allows screening for mechanically stable, electronically suitable interface combinations - applying the technique to screen 175 common semiconductors for viability as electron and hole extracting contacts for CH3NH3PbI3. The screening method can be applied to any semiconductor junction problem and relies on easily obtained experimental or theoretical information electron affinity, ionisation potential, lattice parameters and crystal structure. From the screening we rank the candidates according to a figure of merit, which accounts for band alignment and chemical/mechanical stability of the interface. Our screening predicts stable interfaces with commonly applied electron extraction layers such as TiO2 and ZnO as well giving insight into the optimal polymorphs, surfaces and morphologies for achieving good quality contacts. Finally we also predict potentially effective new hole and electron extraction layers, namely Cu2O, FeO, SiC, GaN, and ZnTe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available