4.2 Article

Work postural ergonomic assessment using two-dimensional joint coordinates

Publisher

JAPAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2022jamdsm0055

Keywords

OWAS; Work-related musculoskeletal disorders; Workload; Machine learning; Motion capture

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [20K14994, 22K04621]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a straightforward technique for evaluating work postures using the OWAS system. By manually acquiring employees' two-dimensional joint coordinates and inputting them into machine learning models, posture codes based on OWAS can be calculated. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of this method.
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent health issues, with awkward posture being one of the risk factors. Observational methods are often used in the manufacturing industry to analyze work postures in production fields. In this study, we present a straightforward technique for evaluating work postures utilizing the Ovako working posture analysis system (OWAS). The proposed technique calculates OWAS-based posture codes by manually acquiring employees' two-dimensional (2D) joint coordinates on the work image and inputting these coordinates into advanced machine learning models. Experiments were conducted to extract three-dimensional (3D) joint coordinates in the global coordinate system in the OWAS-based postures to develop machine learning models. Furthermore, the resulting 3D coordinates were converted to 2D joint coordinates in the camera image coordinate system using the direct linear transformation (DLT) method. The 2D joint coordinates and accompanying OWAS posture codes were utilized as training data to build machine learning models using the support vector machine algorithm. Cross validation confirmed the agreement rate of the OWAS action category (AC) by more than 80%, according to the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available