3.9 Article

Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe's Overseas: A comparative analysis of MOVE case studies

Journal

ONE ECOSYSTEM
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.7.e87179

Keywords

comparative assessment; EU Overseas; EU MAES; ecosystem services; mapping

Funding

  1. European Union under the programme implementation of the Pilot Project - Mapping and Assessing the State of Ecosystems and their Services in the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories: establishing links and pooling resources, MOVE Projec [07.027735/2018/776517/SUB/ENV.D2]
  2. programme Implementation of the Second Year Pilot Project, MOVE-ON Project (MOVE-ON -From Case Studies to Anchor Projects -Setting the Ground to Advance MAES in Europe's Overseas) [07.027735/2019/808239/SUB/ENV.D2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the novel applications of the MAES procedure in the EU Overseas regions and territories. The eight case studies analyzed in this paper show that the implementation of the MAES exercise led to meaningful uptake of the ecosystem services concept in policies and decision-making. However, there are still challenges related to financial resources, training, and technical expertise.
Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) has been widely applied on the European Union (EU) mainland, whereas the EU Overseas entities still bear potential for implementation. This paper presents novel applications of the MAES procedure in the EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories (EU Overseas). Eight case studies from different geographical areas were analysed through a comparative assessment by applying an established framework following key steps in the MAES process, in order to stipulate lessons learned and recommendations for MAES in the EU Overseas. These key steps include the identification of policy questions, stakeholder networks and involvement, application of MAES methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The case studies were conducted and analysed under the umbrella of the EU MOVE pilot project, including the Azores, the Canary Islands, Saint Martin, French Guiana, Martinique, Reunion Island and the Falkland Islands. Each case study represented different governance, policy and decision-making frameworks towards biodiversity and environmental protection. Case studies predominantly addressed the policy domains of Nature and Biodiversity Conservation and Marine and Maritime Policy. Ecosystem Services (ES) were assessed across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales, focusing on terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystems. Results show that the implementation of the case studies was accompanied by extensive communication and dissemination activities. First success stories were visible, where the MAES exercise led to meaningful uptake of the ES concept to policies and decision-making. Yet, there is still work to be done - major bottlenecks were identified related to the MAES implementation centring around financial resources, training and technical expertise. Addressing these aspects can contribute to an enhanced implementation of MAES in the EU Overseas in the future

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available