3.8 Article

In vitro biotransformation assays using fish liver cells: Comparing rainbow trout and carp hepatocytes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.1021880

Keywords

rainbow trout; common carp; bioaccumulation; biotransformation; hepatocytes; in vitro assay

Categories

Funding

  1. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, Germany
  2. Stiftung 3R, Munsingen, Switzerland [14114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study validated the use of primary hepatocytes from rainbow trout for predicting bioconcentration factors (BCF) of chemicals in fish. The study compared biotransformation rate values and BCF predictions between trout and carp hepatocytes, and found that the predicted BCF values were significantly higher in trout than in carp. However, the measured in vivo BCF values did not differ significantly between the two species. This suggests the need for species-specific extrapolation models.
Biotransformation assays using primary hepatocytes from rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, were validated as a reliable in vitro tool to predict in vivo bioconcentration factors (BCF) of chemicals in fish. Given the pronounced interspecies differences of chemical biotransformation, the present study aimed to compare biotransformation rate values and BCF predictions obtained with hepatocytes from the cold-water species, rainbow trout, to data obtained with hepatocytes of the warm-water species, common carp (Cyprinus carpio). In a first step, we adapted the protocol for the trout hepatocyte assay, including the cryopreservation method, to carp hepatocytes. The successful adaptation serves as proof of principle that the in vitro hepatocyte biotransformation assays can be technically transferred across fish species. In a second step, we compared the in vitro intrinsic clearance rates (CLin vitro, int) of two model xenobiotics, benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) and methoxychlor (MXC), in trout and carp hepatocytes. The in vitro data were used to predict in vivo biotransformation rate constants (k(B)) and BCFs, which were then compared to measured in vivo k(B) and BCF values. The CLin vitro, int values of BaP and MXC did not differ significantly between trout and carp hepatocytes, but the predicted BCF values were significantly higher in trout than in carp. In contrast, the measured in vivo BCF values did not differ significantly between the two species. A possible explanation of this discrepancy is that the existing in vitro-in vivo prediction models are parameterized only for trout but not for carp. Therefore, future research needs to develop species-specific extrapolation models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available