4.6 Article

Visualization of size-dependent tumour retention of PEGylated nanographene oxide via SPECT imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 4, Issue 39, Pages 6446-6453

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6tb01892k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11275050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PEGylated nanosized graphene oxides (NGO-PEG) and related derivatives have attracted extensive attention owing to their unique properties, which confer significant theranostic benefits for cancer treatment. The size of NGO-PEG varies largely, from tens of nanometers to micrometers, and the optimal size range with the most efficient tumor retention in vivo remains to be determined. For this purpose, we designed different sizes of NGO-PEG, specifically, ultra-small NGO-PEG (usNGO-PEG, sub-50 nm) and NGO-PEG (over 50 nm) and compared their biological behaviors in vitro and in vivo. Both NGO-PEGs exhibited nearly identical physicochemical properties and low cytotoxicity. Following Cy5.5 tagging, confocal microscopy fluorescence imaging revealed faster and higher dynamic cellular uptake of usNGO-PEG than NGO-PEG. Longitudinal, non-invasive visualization of the NGO-PEGs using single proton emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging with I-125-radiolabeling revealed that tumor retention of usNGO-PEG was significantly higher and longer compared to that of NGO-PEG, whereas the blood circulation and biodistribution of both NGO-PEGs were similar in major organs. In conclusion, Sub-50 nm was further confirmed to be the favorable size for efficient tumor accumulation of PEGylated GO via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. We propose that the sub-50 nm NGO-PEG designed in this study may be effectively utilized to develop novel PEGylated GO-based nanoplatforms for multifunctional cancer nanotheranostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available