4.7 Article

Concurrent estimation of noise and compact-binary signal parameters in gravitational-wave data

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation as part of the LIGO Caltech REU Program [PHY-1852081]
  2. French Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Italian Istituto Nazionale della Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  4. Dutch Nikhef
  5. NSF's LIGO Laboratory - National Science Foundation
  6. NSF [PHY-0757058, PHY-0823459, PHY-2110111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the parameter estimation for compact binary signals in gravitational waves, comparing traditional sequential estimation method and new full marginalization method. The study finds that, at current detector sensitivities, uncertainty about the noise power spectral density has a minor impact on the parameter estimation.
Gravitational-wave parameter estimation for compact binary signals typically relies on sequential estimation of the properties of the detector Gaussian noise and of the binary parameters. This procedure assumes that the noise variance, expressed through its power spectral density, is perfectly known in advance. We assess the impact of this approximation on the estimated parameters by means of an analysis that simultaneously estimates the noise and compact binary parameters, thus allowing us to marginalize over uncertainty in the noise properties. We compare the traditional sequential estimation method and the new full marginalization method using events from the GWTC-3 catalog. We find that the recovered signals and inferred parameters agree to within their statistical measurement uncertainty. At current detector sensitivities, uncertainty about the noise power spectral density is a subdominant effect compared to other sources of uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available