4.6 Article

Synthesis and characterization of robust, mesoporous electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 4, Issue 20, Pages 7650-7657

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta00321d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CSD2009-00050, ENE2013-47826]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya-AGAUR [2014 SGR 1638]
  3. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF, FEDER Programa Competitivitat de Catalunya)
  4. Ramon y Cajal postdoctoral program
  5. Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of mesoporous electrodes in solid oxide cells would lead to a significant enhancement of the performance due to their high surface area and large number of active sites for electrochemical reactions. However, their application in real devices is still hindered by the potential instability of the mesostructure and morphology at high temperatures required for device fabrication and under severe conditions for high-current, long-term operation. Here we report our findings on the preparation and characterization of mesoporous electrodes based on ceria infiltrated with catalysts: an anode consisting of a Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 (SDC) scaffold infiltrated with Ni and a cathode consisting of an SDC scaffold infiltrated with Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3-delta (SSC). In particular, a doped-zirconia electrolyte supported cell with a mesoporous Ni-SDC anode and a mesoporous SSC-SDC cathode demonstrates an excellent peak power density of 565 mW cm(-2) at 750 degrees C (using humidified hydrogen as the fuel). More importantly, both mesoporous electrodes display remarkable stability, yielding a combined electrode virtual non-degradation for the last 500 hours of the test at a constant current density of 635 mA cm(-2) at 750 degrees C, demonstrating the potential of these mesoporous materials as robust electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells or other high-temperature electrochemical energy storage and conversion devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available