4.6 Review

Pore performance: artificial nanoscale constructs that mimic the biomolecular transport of the nuclear pore complex

Journal

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 23, Pages 4925-4937

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2na00389a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2021-03968]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2021-03968] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the important efforts in replicating the shuttle-cargo transport mechanism of the nuclear pore complex in artificial settings. However, achieving selective and efficient artificial shuttle-cargo transport of biomolecules is still a long way off.
The nuclear pore complex is a nanoscale assembly that achieves shuttle-cargo transport of biomolecules: a certain cargo molecule can only pass the barrier if it is attached to a shuttle molecule. In this review we summarize the most important efforts aiming to reproduce this feature in artificial settings. This can be achieved by solid state nanopores that have been functionalized with the most important proteins found in the biological system. Alternatively, the nanopores are chemically modified with synthetic polymers. However, only a few studies have demonstrated a shuttle-cargo transport mechanism and due to cargo leakage, the selectivity is not comparable to that of the biological system. Other recent approaches are based on DNA origami, though biomolecule transport has not yet been studied with these. The highest selectivity has been achieved with macroscopic gels, but they are yet to be scaled down to nano-dimensions. It is concluded that although several interesting studies exist, we are still far from achieving selective and efficient artificial shuttle-cargo transport of biomolecules. Besides being of fundamental interest, such a system could be potentially useful in bioanalytical devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available