4.4 Article

The Zb(b)over-bar couplings at future e+e- colliders

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2016)062

Keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Heavy Quark Physics

Funding

  1. Munich Institute for Astro- and Particle Physics (MIAPP) of the DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe
  2. Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) International Traveling Award [H95120N1U7]
  3. CAS Center for Excellence in Particle Physics (CCEPP)
  4. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  5. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many new physics models predict sizable modifications to the SM Zb (b) over bar couplings, while the corresponding measurements at LEP and SLC exhibit some discrepancy with the SM predictions. After updating the current results on the Zb (b) over bar coupling constraints from global fits, we list the observables that are most important for improving the Zb (b) over bar coupling constraints and estimate the expected precision reach of three proposed future e(+)e(-) colliders, CEPC, ILC and FCC-ee. We consider both the case that the results are SM-like and the one that the Zb (b) over bar couplings deviate significantly from the SM predictions. We show that, if we assume the value of the Zb (b) over bar couplings to be within 68% CL of the current measurements, any one of the three colliders will be able to rule out the SM with more than 99.9999% CL (5 sigma). We study the implications of the improved Zb (b) over bar coupling constraints on new physics models, and point out their complementarity with the constraints from the direct search of new physics particles at the LHC, as well as with Higgs precision measurements. Our results provide a further motivation for the construction of future e(+)e(-) colliders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available