Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND LAW, CSLAW 2022
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 87-100Publisher
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3511265.3550439
Keywords
Sequential Decision-making; Reinforcement Learning; Bandits; Active Learning; AI and Society; Law and AI; Responsible AI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The article discusses the promises and challenges of using sequential decision-making algorithms in law and public policy, emphasizing the distinct methodological challenges posed in these fields compared to the private sector. Further research and development are needed to address these unique challenges in machine learning for law and public policy applications.
We explore the promises and challenges of employing sequential decision-making algorithms - such as bandits, reinforcement learning, and active learning - in law and public policy. While such algorithms have well-characterized performance in the private sector (e.g., online advertising), the tendency to naively apply algorithms motivated by one domain, often online advertisements, can be called the advertisement fallacy. Our main thesis is that law and public policy pose distinct methodological challenges that the machine learning community has not yet addressed. Machine learning will need to address these methodological problems to move beyond ads. Public law, for instance, can pose multiple objectives, necessitate batched and delayed feedback, and require systems to learn rational, causal decision-making policies, each of which presents novel questions at the research frontier. We discuss a wide range of potential applications of sequential decision-making algorithms in regulation and governance, including public health, environmental protection, tax administration, occupational safety, and benefits adjudication. We use these examples to highlight research needed to render sequential decision making policy-compliant, adaptable, and effective in the public sector. We also note the potential risks of such deployments and describe how sequential decision systems can also facilitate the discovery of harms. We hope our work inspires more investigation of sequential decision making in law and public policy, which provide unique challenges for machine learning researchers with potential for significant social benefit.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available