4.4 Article

Disambiguating seesaw models using invariant mass variables at hadron colliders

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)118

Keywords

Hadronic Colliders

Funding

  1. Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran
  2. TUM University Foundation Fellowship
  3. DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe
  4. DOE [DE-SC0010296]
  5. National Science Foundation [PHY-1315155]
  6. LHC Theory Initiative postdoctoral fellowship (NSF Grant) [PHY-0969510]
  7. STFC [ST/J000418/1, ST/L000520/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000520/1, ST/J000418/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Physics [1523395, 1315155] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose ways to distinguish between different mechanisms behind the collider signals of TeV-scale seesaw models for neutrino masses using kinematic endpoints of invariant mass variables. We particularly focus on two classes of such models widely discussed in literature: (i) Standard Model extended by the addition of singlet neutrinos and (ii) Left-Right Symmetric Models. Relevant scenarios involving the same smoking-gun collider signature of dilepton plus dijet with no missing transverse energy differ from one another by their event topology, resulting in distinctive relationships among the kinematic endpoints to be used for discerning them at hadron colliders. These kinematic endpoints are readily translated to the mass parameters of the on-shell particles through simple analytic expressions which can be used for measuring the masses of the new particles. A Monte Carlo simulation with detector effects is conducted to test the viability of the proposed strategy in a realistic environment. Finally, we discuss the future prospects of testing these scenarios at the root s = 14 and 100 TeV hadron colliders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available