4.4 Article

Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections to pp → W+W- → 4 leptons at the LHC

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2016)065

Keywords

NLO Computations

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DE 623/2-1]
  2. Institutional Strategy of the University of Tubingen (DFG) [ZUK 63]
  3. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [05H2015]
  4. DFG through the Research Training Group RTG 2044
  5. Spanish MINECO of ICCUB (Unidad de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu) [MDM-2014-0369]
  6. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts
  7. Universities of the State of Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
  8. [FPA2013-46570-C2-1-P]
  9. [2014-SGR-104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of the first calculation of next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections to W-boson pair production at the LHC that fully takes into account leptonic W-boson decays and off-shell effects. Employing realistic event selections, we discuss the corrections in situations that are typical for the study of W-boson pairs as a signal process or of Riggs-boson decays H -> WW*, to which NV-boson pair production represents an irreducible background. In particular, we compare the full off-shell results, obtained treating the NV-boson resonances in the complex-mass scheme, to previous results in the so-called double-pole approximation, which is based on an expansion of the loop amplitudes about the W resonance poles. At small and intermediate scales, i.e. in particular in angular and rapidity distributions, the two approaches show the expected agreement at the level of fractions of a percent, but larger differences appear in the TeV range. For transverse-momentum distributions, the differences can even exceed the 10% level in the TeV range where background diagrams with one instead of two resonant W bosons gain in importance because of recoil effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available