4.4 Review

The Why and How of the Integrative Review

Journal

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 168-192

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1094428120935507

Keywords

philosophy of science; meta-analysis; quantitative research; research design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the importance of integrative reviews and outlines an approach to writing them. It highlights the unique value of integrative reviews among other knowledge-synthesis vehicles and provides guidance on addressing challenges in composing them.
An effective integrative review can provide important insight into the current state of research on a topic and can recommend future research directions. This article discusses different types of reviews and outlines an approach to writing an integrative review. It includes guidance regarding challenges encountered when composing integrative reviews, such as fair representation of different perspectives and synthesizing that knowledge to yield new insights. An integrative review is of unique value among other types of knowledge-synthesis vehicles, such as narrative or systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Because each has distinctive but important approaches to synthesizing empirical knowledge, our protocol for writing integrative reviews is designed to complement these other knowledge-synthesis vehicles to best advance organization science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available