4.3 Review

CBTp for people with treatment refractory schizophrenia on clozapine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 321-328

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1836558

Keywords

Treatment refractory schizophrenia; clozapine; CBTp; systematic review; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive behavioural therapy may have small benefits for positive symptoms in clozapine refractory schizophrenia, but does not alter negative symptoms. Given the low risks and limited alternative options, this approach should be considered in this population.
Background Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), an effective treatment for people with schizophrenia, may have a role in clozapine refractory schizophrenia. Aims A systematic-review and meta-analysis on the impact of CBTp on psychotic symptoms in people on clozapine. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Cochrane for randomised control trials of CBTp as augmentation in people with treatment-refractory schizophrenia on clozapine and conducted pair-wise meta-analyses. Results Four studies met inclusion criteria. On pairwise meta-analyses, the primary outcome of total psychotic symptoms was not significantly altered by CBTp at either therapy endpoint or six to twelve months follow-up. Secondary outcomes showed that CBT improved positive symptoms at both therapy endpoint (SMD -0.33, 95%CI -0.50 to -0.16,p = 0.002, I-2= 0%) and six to twelve months follow-up (SMD -0.20, 95%CI -0.38 to -0.02,p = 0.03, I-2= 0%) though did not alter negative psychotic symptoms at either timepoint. Conclusions CBTp may lead to small benefits for positive symptoms refractory to clozapine. Given the low risks associated with CBTp, and the limited alternative options for clozapine refractory schizophrenia, this approach should be considered in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available