4.2 Article

Introversive semiosis in action: depictions in opera rehearsals

Journal

SOCIAL SEMIOTICS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 601-620

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2021.1907180

Keywords

Opera rehearsals; multimodal interaction analysis; depictions; introversive semiosis; aesthetics; social interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses how opera rehearsal participants use depictions to propose and convey information, and the role of depictions in the artistic creation. By using depictions, participants can simultaneously self-reference and reference prototypes of mundane behavior, thus accomplishing the artistic labor of creating a performance.
This paper focuses on how opera rehearsal participants use depictions to accomplish proposals; they use a locally created scene, comprised of concrete embodiments to represent another physically or temporally distant scene. Whereas earlier work investigating depictions in interaction has mainly focused on demonstrations in pedagogical scenarios, this paper will discuss how depictions serve the ongoing creation, and aesthetic negotiation, of a yet-to-be-artistic product. In simultaneously creating and referencing iterations of this artwork, participants' depictions are both self-referential, in introversive semiosis, as well as externally referencing prototypes of mundane behaviour, in extroversive semiosis. We argue that the negotiations of the extroversive and introversive references through depiction constitute the artistic labour of creating a performance. Furthermore, we suggest that the iterative nature of rehearsing an artistic piece demonstrates analogies between introversive semiosis and interactional techniques for projection and depiction. Opera is accomplished through dynamic collaborative social processes, techniques for which include the depictions described in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available