4.4 Review

Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Psychology, Applied

Computational Literature Reviews: Method, Algorithms, and Roadmap

David Antons et al.

Summary: The volume and complexity of scientific literature require systematic and rigorous literature reviews, and computational techniques are being used to support researchers in synthesizing large bodies of literature. However, there is a lack of actionable guidance on how to design, conduct, and document such computationally augmented literature reviews. This study introduces computational literature reviews (CLRs) as a new review method and presents a six-step roadmap to guide researchers in conducting CLRs.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2023)

Article Psychology, Applied

Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research

Martin R. W. Hiebl

Summary: This article addresses the importance of the sample selection process in systematic reviews and offers critical evaluations of previous reviews. It identifies key issues to consider in the selection process and provides benchmark figures for future reviews.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2023)

Review Psychology, Applied

The Why and How of the Integrative Review

Matthew A. Cronin et al.

Summary: This article discusses the importance of integrative reviews and outlines an approach to writing them. It highlights the unique value of integrative reviews among other knowledge-synthesis vehicles and provides guidance on addressing challenges in composing them.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2023)

Article Psychology, Applied

Moving Beyond Templates: A Bricolage Approach to Conducting Trustworthy Qualitative Research

Michael G. Pratt et al.

Summary: This article discusses how the misuse of methodological templates can reduce the quality of research, and proposes methodological bricolage as an alternative approach to qualitative research. The authors use their own research and a broader set of qualitative research articles to illustrate how methodological bricolage can be used to enhance trustworthiness. The benefits and cautions of using this approach are outlined.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2022)

Article Business

Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification

Jorgen Sandberg et al.

Summary: The article argues that traditional definitions of 'theory' are too restrictive and fail to recognize the existence of multiple types of scientific knowledge. It presents a typology of five basic theory types to provide researchers with a framework for developing and evaluating knowledge in more varied ways. This typology also aims to create a more level playing field within the academic community.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (2021)

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method

Ginny Brunton et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2020)

Review Business

Advancing Theory with Review Articles

Corinne Post et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (2020)

Review Regional & Urban Planning

Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review

Yu Xiao et al.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (2019)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

Visualizing Literature Review Theme Evolution on Timeline Maps: Comparison Across Disciplines

Chunlei Tang et al.

IEEE ACCESS (2019)

Review Business

Effective Search in Rugged Performance Landscapes: A Review and Outlook

Oliver Baumann et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?

Trisha Greenhalgh et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2018)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

Review and Theory Symbiosis: An Introspective Retrospective

Dorothy E. Leidner

JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2018)

Article Business

WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET? ENHANCING METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

Herman Aguinis et al.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS (2018)

Review Business

Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research

Kimberly D. Elsbach et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (2018)

Article Psychology, Applied

Text Mining in Organizational Research

Vladimer B. Kobayashi et al.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2018)

Editorial Material Nursing

Top 10 Tips for Undertaking Synthesis Research

Kathleen Knafl et al.

RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH (2017)

Proceedings Paper Computer Science, Software Engineering

Text-mining Techniques and Tools for Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review

Luyi Feng et al.

2017 24TH ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APSEC 2017) (2017)

Review Health Policy & Services

How do we define the policy impact of public health research? A systematic review

Kristel Alla et al.

HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS (2017)

Review Management

A NEW PARADIGM FOR SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Christian F. Durach et al.

JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (2017)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews

Guy Pare et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2016)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews

N. R. Haddaway et al.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2015)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews

Guy Pare et al.

INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT (2015)

Editorial Material Computer Science, Information Systems

Avoiding methodological overdose: a declaration for independent ends

Mike W. Chiasson

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (2015)

Editorial Material Computer Science, Information Systems

Avoiding methodological overdose: a declaration for independent ends

Mike W. Chiasson

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (2015)

Article Psychology, Applied

Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization

Ivan Zupic et al.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2015)

Editorial Material Computer Science, Information Systems

What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations

Frantz Rowe

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2014)

Review Business

Within-Person Variability in Job Performance: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda

Reeshad S. Dalal et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (2014)

Article Education & Educational Research

Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist Conceptualization

Herman Aguinis et al.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION (2014)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

A qualitative evidence synthesis of employees' views of workplace smoking reduction or cessation interventions

Christopher Carroll et al.

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2013)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review

Monika Kastner et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2012)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

A visual analysis approach to validate the selection review of primary studies in systematic reviews

Katia R. Felizardo et al.

INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY (2012)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A worked example of best fit framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents

Christopher Carroll et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)

Article Business

BUILDING THEORY ABOUT THEORY BUILDING: WHAT CONSTITUTES A THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION?

Kevin G. Corley et al.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW (2011)

Review Business

Anger in Organizations: Review and Integration

Donald E. Gibson et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The capture mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews

Monika Kastner et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Review Business

Resource Dependence Theory: A Review

Amy J. Hillman et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (2009)

Review Information Science & Library Science

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

Maria J. Grant et al.

HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL (2009)

Article Education & Educational Research

Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective

Harsh Suri et al.

REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (2009)

Article Philosophy

Systematicity: The nature of science

Paul Hoyningen-Huene

PHILOSOPHIA (2008)

Review Business

Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us

Andre O. Laplume et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (2008)

Article Psychology, Applied

The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management

Jeremy C. Short et al.

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2008)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

The impact of review articles

Catherine M. Ketcham et al.

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION (2007)

Article Nursing

A research synthesis overview

Katherine G. Bowman

NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY (2007)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management

Andrew S. Pullin et al.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2006)

Article Business

Some predictors of SMJ article impact

DD Bergh et al.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (2006)

Review Education & Educational Research

'Clarity bordering on stupidity': where's the quality in systematic review?

M MacLure

JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY (2005)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review

T Greenhalgh et al.

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2005)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Classifying the findings in qualitative studies

M Sandelowski et al.

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2003)