4.6 Review

Instrumental Techniques to Classify Olive Oils according to Their Quality

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 139-160

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2021.1940829

Keywords

Electronic devices; extra virgin olive oil; gas chromatography; ion mobility spectrometry; lampante; mass spectrometry; quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review explores alternative techniques for classifying olive oils, complementing the current official methods, and provides a detailed description of their advantages and disadvantages. These new techniques can replace or supplement the conventional physicochemical analysis and sensory tasting methods.
This review includes an update of the publications on quality classification of olive oils into extra, virgin or lampante olive oil categories. Nowadays, the official method to carry out this classification is time-consuming and, sometimes, it is not systematic and/or objective. It is based on conventional physicochemical analysis and on a sensorial tasting of olive oils carried out by a panel of experts. The aim of this review was to explore and give value to the alternative techniques reported in the bibliography to complement the current official methods established for that classification of olive oils. Specifically considered were non-separation and separation analytical techniques which could contribute to correctly classify olive oils according to their physicochemical and/or sensorial characteristics. An in-depth description has been written on the methods used to differentiate these three types of olive oils and the main advantages and disadvantages of the proposed procedures. The techniques here reviewed could be a real and fast option to complement or even substitute some of the analysis included in the official method. Finally, general trends and detected difficulties found to address this issue have been discussed throughout the article.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available