3.8 Review

Gender differences in the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 1303-1327

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01677-w

Keywords

Covid-19; Vaccination intention; Gender differences; Health care workers; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis found lower vaccination intentions among women than men in the context of COVID-19. This difference was consistent across multiple countries and more pronounced in samples of healthcare workers.
Aim We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse gender differences in COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Subject and methods PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched (November 2020 to January 2021) for studies reporting absolute frequencies of COVID-19 vaccination intentions by gender. Averaged odds ratios comparing vaccination intentions among men and women were computed. Descriptive analyses of the studies were reported. Results Sixty studies were included in the review and data from 46 studies (n = 141,550) were available for meta-analysis. A majority (58%) of papers reported men to have higher intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Meta-analytic calculations showed that significantly fewer women stated that they would get vaccinated than men, OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.55). This effect was evident in several countries, and the difference was bigger in samples of health care workers than in unspecified general population samples. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis found lower vaccination intentions among women than men. This difference is discussed in the light of recent data on actual vaccination rates in different countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available