4.0 Article

Electrolyte circulation effects in electrochemical performance for different flow fields of all-vanadium redox flow battery

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/est2.336

Keywords

electrolyte circulation; energy efficiency; flow field; polarization curve; redox flow battery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the electrochemical performance and hydrodynamic effects of various flow fields in a vanadium redox flow battery were compared. The results showed that the serpentine flow field achieved higher coulombic, voltage, and energy efficiencies, and stable energy efficiency was maintained. Computational fluid dynamics simulations provided insights into the reasons behind the superior performance of the serpentine flow field compared to other flow fields.
A comparative study of electrochemical performance and hydrodynamic effects on a single cell for all vanadium redox flow batteries has been investigated in the present study. Electrochemical performance of a cell has been conducted with an active area of 414 cm(2) fitted with serpentine, interdigitated, and enhanced cross-flow split serpentine (ECFSS) flow fields. The effects of electrolyte circulation rates on the electrochemical performance have been investigated for each flow field, and stable energy efficiency was achieved in 20 charge/discharge cycles for all three flow fields. Higher coulombic, voltage, and energy efficiencies in the serpentine flow field were achieved to be 96%, 82%, and 79%, respectively. The maximum peak power density values for the serpentine, ECFSS, and interdigitated flow field were found to be 158.2, 152.5, and 136.8 mW center dot cm(-2), respectively, at a flow rate of 345 mL center dot min(-1). Furthermore, detailed flow analysis was simulated by using computational fluid dynamics, and these studies postulated the reasons for the higher performance of the serpentine flow field compared to other flow fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available