3.8 Article

Surgical treatment of 61 consecutive patients with maxillary stage 3 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws using a pedicled buccal fat pad

Journal

ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 251-261

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01061-2

Keywords

MRONJ; Jaw osteonecrosis; Buccal fat pad; Reconstruction; Antiresorptive treatment; Quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that using the buccal fat pad (BFP) for the closure of maxillary sinus defects in stage 3 MRONJ patients is a reliable method with a high success rate. Successful surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation may improve the body weight and quality of life of patients.
Purpose Buccal fat pad (BFP) is used for the closure of large oroantral defects caused by surgical removal of the necrotic bone in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study aimed to evaluate the use of BFP for the closure of maxillary sinus defects in stage 3 MRONJ patients. Methods This study recruited 61patients with large oroantral defects caused by MRONJ, including 49 patients with cancer and 12 patients with osteoporosis. Lesions were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Results Among the 61 patients, 51 (83.6%) healed uneventfully, and 5 patients (8.2%) had local dehiscence and exposed bone; these 56 patients (91.8%) all healed after first or second operation. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was associated with being non-cured and might be an indicator for the healing process. All patients experienced a significant increase in body weight postoperatively. Conclusions This study suggest that block resection with removal of the necrotic bone combined with radical sinusotomy and closure of the defect with BFP is a reliable method to cure MRONJ lesions with a high success rate, and successful operation and prosthetic rehabilitation may improve body weight and the quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available