4.6 Article

DNA methylation and transcription of the FOXO3a gene are associated with ankylosing spondylitis

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 483-493

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-022-00831-2

Keywords

Ankylosing spondylitis; FOXO3a; Methylation; mRNA; Diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the association between the methylation level and transcript level of the FOXO3a gene with AS susceptibility. It is found that DNA methylation and transcription of FOXO3a may be related to AS susceptibility and have a crucial role in the diagnosis of AS.
To explore the association between methylation level and transcript level of Forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a) gene with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) susceptibility. Methylation levels of the FOXO3a promoter were measured in 84 AS patients and 83 healthy controls. A total of 77 patients and 66 healthy subjects were included in subsequent mRNA level testing. DNA methylation levels of 107 CpG sites on 6 CpG islands in the FOXO3a gene were investigated. This study indicated that CpG-4 and CpG-5 islands were markedly hypomethylated in AS patients. The methylation level of CpG-4 island in AS patients was negatively correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). Moreover, FOXO3a mRNA levels were significantly decreased in AS patients and were obviously negatively correlated with the methylation levels of CpG-2 and CpG-5 islands in AS patients without treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of differential methylated CpG sites of FOXO3a were 74.7 and 85.4%, respectively. Besides, FOXO3a mRNA had a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 68.8%. DNA methylation and transcription of FOXO3a might be related to AS susceptibility and play a crucial role in the diagnosis of AS, but many open questions remain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available