4.7 Article

A Tensor-Based Online RPCA Model for Compressive Background Subtraction

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3170789

Keywords

Videos; Image coding; Tensors; Task analysis; Correlation; Principal component analysis; Computational modeling; Background subtraction; compressive imaging; tensor modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background subtraction of videos is a fundamental research topic in computer vision. However, current methods based on matrix modeling have limitations. To address this issue, we propose a tensor-based online compressive video reconstruction and background subtraction method that can better adapt to complex video scenes.
Background subtraction of videos has been a fundamental research topic in computer vision in the past decades. To alleviate the computation burden and enhance the efficiency, background subtraction from online compressive measurements has recently attracted much attention. However, current methods still have limitations. First, they are all based on matrix modeling, which breaks the spatial structure within video frames. Second, they generally ignore the complex disturbance within the background, which reduces the efficiency of the low-rank assumption. To alleviate this issue, we propose a tensor-based online compressive video reconstruction and background subtraction method, abbreviated as NIOTenRPCA, by explicitly modeling the background disturbance in different frames as nonidentical but correlated noise. By virtue of such sophisticated modeling, the proposed method can well adapt to complex video scenes and, thus, perform more robustly. Extensive experiments on a series of real-world video datasets have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method compared with the existing state of the arts. The code of our method is released on the website: https://github.com/crystalzina/NIOTenRPCA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available